Jump to content

Khassera

TMV World Legacy Member
  • Posts

    513
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Khassera

  1. Is it flat or is it just me? It still sounds like it's not a free configuration. Are you feeling strain? I like the distortion though. I dunno what your teacher's having you do, but I think that lightening the mass would be apt. It's not only about the volume, it's rather the way you trust the headvoice to sound as badass as your chestvoice, and, in fact, how much more badass it sounds once you let it do most of the work. Can you sing this song with literally only headvoice, but keep it connected? If not, there's something in the vowels you're not doing in an optimal way. Or that'd be my take on it. I'd still just try singing this lightly with a "ou" shape, then just add mass and open it up a bit. Someone shoot me down if I'm wrong: I used to think shaping vowels and "singing vowels" or "modifying vowels" was in relation to the phrases sung rather than pitch. It's more about keeping a certain vowel shape in your larynx/throat while singing the phrase. So you're singing phrases, but the "feel" of the phrase is kept on a certain vowel, usually a narrow one, when dealing with difficult notes. To try it out sing the first phrase on a narrow vowel, for example, "ou," which forces you to keep your mouth very narrow. Then just relax and open your mouth wider and the vowel will sound more like "ae" but your throat will feel like it's still singing "ou." this feeling is definitely not strain, more of a release. Doing it like Dio is easier (not easy) once you do it like Sanchez first. HEAVEN AND HELL Coheed and Cambria:
  2. Tight, dude. What phone adds reverb/delay to the recording?
  3. Tervetuloa tännekin. Rob, ron's suggesting that Tappi sings the song using straight vowels and not tight diphtongs. He typed out the vowels. And it's ah-n (ah + n = on) aeh-nd ("ae" as in cat + nd = and) so on and so forth. I'd go as far as to use a vowel you don't have to modify at all to get the release into the mix/head and open it up from there. Maybe try singing with only oo or a german u (suomeksi uu tai yy). I think your tone is awesome, it does sound a bit difficult though. I dunno if you feel it, but it sounds like you're straining, and I bet that's why you're not executing the melismas Dio does and there's some spots where the phrase just abruptly ends. All in all I think it's good, but you shouldn't need to shout over the music, it's not how Dio did it. Not saying it's the only way to do it, it's just the easiest way to do it.
  4.   It's flat. "I am strong" the "I am" part sounds really released, you should try and keep that feeling in the other phrases also. Try going through the song with either "ee" (suomeksi ii) or "oo" (suomeksi uu/yy) and try to let your voice drift into a clear, bright headvoice, not an airy headvoice. Once you have that down, add mass.   Less air, less volume, more resonance, if you can't sing it soft and light don't try to belt it loud.
  5. With training you could sing in the original key.
  6. Jesus christ, I wrote like an A4s worth of an answer but somehow it got lost.   What I meant was that here's how I'd fix this issue:   You have the tonality spot on on the "Oh" lick before "and cold - cold spirits of ice," so keep the tonality/configuration the same as in that lick, and do the "can you remember" phrase with an "oh" sound. So instead of singing "can you remember" you sing "oh-oh-oh-oh-oh" (not staccato but a pulsing, controlled phrase). Once you can sing it as loud as you need while staying in tune, change the phrase to "gan you remember." Once you have that down pat you change it by adding the hard plosive K sound ("Can you remember").   And obviously you hammer at that specific phrase 'til you onset it with freedom and ease, and the power will come as the technique gets ingrained.
  7. To add to Ron's post:   I don't know how Rob has you practice, but I suggest going through the song in very, very small phrases, recording them, playing them back until they're perfect. Don't move on until you feel you nailed everything, since this song, if any, is a good example of going from "I'm too young to die" to "Nightmare."
  8. My opinion on the song:   - I think you sound flat. It might be the mix, but it sounds as if you're just a tad below what you're supposed to be singing. It might be that you're dampening the larynx too much? - Don't go overboard with the effects, Layne didn't. - You start out really heavy, "AHM The man in the box" instead of the really droll, creaky, almost nasal falsettoish tone Layne started with, and if you're going to do that you'd better nail the pitch on the first try, since it leaves no room for subtle correction.   + Your tone is f*ing awesome dude, you've got a great voice + The chorus sounds great, very powerful even without the compression. Can't wait 'til you get some compression going.   You sound a bit scandinavian.
  9. Well let me ask you this: What do you think? What is good and what is bad?
  10.   Thanks Robert! I've done some random workouts here and there. It's going great, even though it's a bit different than what I'm used to.   Quentin, it sounds like your higher register is "separate" from your lower register. You gotta hammer at those connecting notes to smooth the passagio, and it has to be as effortless as possible. I dunno if you own Pillars, but "The Hero," I feel, is a great exercise for steamrolling the passagio.
  11. Yeah, the "I love it, I need it" isn't near as ballsy as what I'd like to hear, and the verses are heavy enough that I know you could do better.
  12. Ohhhhhhhh man, Nocturnal rites is awesome! I remember getting to know them by accidentally picking the wrong no-label CD off my very, very christian friend's brother's shelf. I'm an atheist, but obviously my friend's parents were devout, where as my buddy was a bit in between. Threw us both the f* off that the CD was Nocturnal Rites' Sacred Talisman. I was like "wtf is this?! It's AWESOME! I WANT MORE!" Lindqvist is just amazing, he's got a great tonality. And you nail this cover like a boss. Well done! :)
  13. That is amazing. Thanks, along with a rep point. That just made everything easier for me in about 2 seconds.
  14. That is fricking awesome dude! Right up to the "never be free" point, that kinda threw a curveball there I mean, it's great, sounds fine I'm sure, but I didn't expect you to use a tonality like that. A bit of a turn for the Jon Oliva there? Sounds like you've been working your nuts off dude. Keep doing what you're doing. EDIT: Love the f-r-i-c-k-i-n-g autoedit there. lmao
  15. I thought this was fun as hell! That dip at "seldom do you *see*" really throws me off. Whatever.
  16. Just your voice? I like it. I think you have a nice tone, and if your technique was any better you'd probably sound good. Very weak projection though, you'd benefit from some vocal practice other than just singing.
×
×
  • Create New...