Jump to content

Reinforced Falsetto? Full Belting Voice? Or The Ultimate Mixing?

Rate this topic


SupaCi

Recommended Posts

There's a gospel singer name Tonex who has really mastered his voice. He's mixed his chest voice and head voice so perfectly that his transition between them are effortless and unheard.

In his vocal range video:

Around @1:35 He gets in the 5th octave and he's able to continue to belt his head notes; creating a strong and resonate sound uncommon in men. I was told it was called a reinforced falsetto. Then someone else told me its just him belting his head notes in full voice (which doesn't sound right to me). And my personal opinion is that he just really mixes his voice well...

So my question is, which one is it and how is it achieved?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's a gospel singer name Tonex who has really mastered his voice. He's mixed his chest voice and head voice so perfectly that his transition between them are effortless and unheard.

<clip snip>

(up top) I was told it was called a reinforced falsetto. Then someone else told me its just him belting his head notes in full voice (which doesn't sound right to me). And my personal opinion is that he just really mixes his voice well...

So my question is, which one is it and how is it achieved?

SupaCi: It could be either, and it would be very difficult for the listener to tell the difference unless they were done side by side for comparison.

As to how it is achieved... that's easier to answer (somewhat harder to do). He sings with firm fold closure, not particularly loudly, with enough twang to keep the bite in the tone, and uses differing vowels which resonate well for the various ranges. He probably lets his larynx rise for the extreme high range, but does so without constricting tension.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

SupaCi: It could be either, and it would be very difficult for the listener to tell the difference unless they were done side by side for comparison.

As to how it is achieved... that's easier to answer (somewhat harder to do). He sings with firm fold closure, not particularly loudly, with enough twang to keep the bite in the tone, and uses differing vowels which resonate well for the various ranges. He probably lets his larynx rise for the extreme high range, but does so without constricting tension.

Hey! I live in Carrollton, Tx too! lol But thanks Mr. Fraser.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh yeah, Steven? I worked on Castle Hill Elementary. Tom Hicks Elementary. That was a monster. 104,000 sq. feet built on the side of a hill. And I was in charge of the Carrollton-Farmers Branch Community Learning Center. It used to be a church and was turned into a kindergarten and admin center.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh yeah, Steven? I worked on Castle Hill Elementary. Tom Hicks Elementary. That was a monster. 104,000 sq. feet built on the side of a hill. And I was in charge of the Carrollton-Farmers Branch Community Learning Center. It used to be a church and was turned into a kindergarten and admin center.

Yeah, ronws.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Doesn't it say on the screen? :)

It does, but I was wondering if it has been wrongly labeled, cuz the note just before that is C6, which I guess is the Female Soprano C? So D7 would be one octave plus a whole tone higher than the female soprano C? Just wondering if it might be a D6.

Fahim

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I have often wondered this with other singers, for example Chris Cornell. His high stuff (say around D5) has so much weigh and power on it, i can't see how it could be achieved with any of the 3 ways mentioned.

Another example I am curious about is Adam Lambert. When he sings up around G5 kinda territory, it's very pure but around his D5 it's a lot more powerful and gritty. Is he using the same technique and adjusting it to create different sounds or using two different parts of his voice?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have often wondered this with other singers, for example Chris Cornell. His high stuff (say around D5) has so much weigh and power on it, i can't see how it could be achieved with any of the 3 ways mentioned.

Another example I am curious about is Adam Lambert. When he sings up around G5 kinda territory, it's very pure but around his D5 it's a lot more powerful and gritty. Is he using the same technique and adjusting it to create different sounds or using two different parts of his voice?

i sing some cornell, and i can you it's a lot of strongly supported head voice.

just going for it...acting it...no holding back in the least...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 years later...

mmh but he is just using MLN, that is not difficult to do, here is me doing it at G5

https://soundcloud.com/gerardon89/g5

NO bro just no... that thing this guy does is very very hard to do... he alters between light curbing curbinglike neural up on top to mln and basicly to my ears he can probably do whatever the hell he wants with his voice spiltsecond riffs and runs between modes comeon...

So no you cant say, "this is just MLN, ez mode" not one per thousand proffesional singers can do what this guy does with that quality.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

well basicly all im saying just listen to some performances he has curbing up very high, basicly with that control he can choose what he wants. but he wails alot so thats why he uses alot of neutral.

If there ever was a degree in vocalmastery this guy has it...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bNJjN_DcS_o

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...