Jump to content

Jeremy Mohler

Moderator & Review Specialist
  • Posts

    554
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    5

Posts posted by Jeremy Mohler

  1. On 4/2/2016 at 5:52 AM, ronws said:

    To quote Waylon Jennings, "I don't think Hank done it this-a-way." But it would be very close, as if this were a modern recording but the same sound voice some what. I like your version better. The problem with Hank's recordings was not just tech limits it was his full on nasal sound that was okay in small doses but grew to be overbearing very quickly. Whereas, you have a pleasing voice for a southern gentleman.

    So, what would have caused you to move from Ole Miss to So Cal? School? Affairs of the heart? Extradition policies? :bang:

    Thanks a lot man, I appreciate it "Southern Gentleman" hahaha.. reminds me of Chet Atkin's guitar more than myself. :) 

    I plan to move back purely because I miss the country lifestyle.  Thought I would come out to the city for bigger opportunities with school but I ended up finding out that the opportunities weren't worth the stress of living in the heart of the city.  I'm thankful for the experience but I can't wait to get back heheh.  Thanks again you two.  

  2. Thank you both so much for taking the time, I think your criticisms are definitely on point.  I did lower the song quite a bit, probably too low for my voice but unfortunately any higher would have also been too high. Also, I'm a big fan of Roy Orbison so I appreciate the comparison.

    I will probably work on centering the pitch and then see if I can eventually raise the key without hurting myself.  Thanks again. :) 

  3. Having your singing reviewed here is a payed service due to how hectic the section became in the past when everyone on the internet could post their singing with no obligations to the community. (turned into hundreds of posts from people who just came to get reviewed and leave)  The membership plan is extremely modest and helps keep this forum running. Consider getting a month if you want to participate in the review section. :) 

    http://www.themodernvocalistworld.com/store/category/2-premium-membership-plans/

     

  4. Really cool song choice man!  Definitely a favorite of mine. :) Smokey is the true master in the soulful light head voice field.

    So I heard the original and the new one and here are the improvements I can hear musically speaking:

    + Improved pitch on your vocal runs, and in general.

    + Rhythm is more on beat, the first one had a lot of rushing particularly on the second line in the original.

    + Better sound quality

    + Nicer feel for the song.

    Only negative criticism I have is that the last falsetto run at the end of the second one was a bit out of place.  Other than that, only other thing is the fact that most is an octave below the Smokey version, which isn't necessarily a negative but does kinda feel underwhelming at times. 

    I'm sure if you keep up what you are doing in another year you will really be looking good. :) 

  5. 53 minutes ago, ronws said:

    It was eerie how close that was to the original. Are you sure you are not related?

    Seriously, you should do more of this stuff. Campy glam rock. In fact, I bet you could do a more original cover of "Come On feel the Noise" originally recorded by Slade, a similar band, but better than they did it and more honorable than that of Quiet Riot, though that song and "Metal Health" did make them the first Heavy Metal band to get to number one.

    Bravo, Jeremy.

     

    Thanks man, that means a lot!  Maybe he is a distant cousin haha.. I think it's the double track that makes it sound similar to the T. Rex style. :) I know the song you mention, but not sure if I've heard the original.  I just know the hair metal version. 

    14 minutes ago, JonJon said:

    Was this song head voice though?

    For me it was just a light twangy chest, I'm not bridging at all here or anything.  If you are asking about the original song, I am not sure.  I'd imagine the same but only he would know hehe.  Thanks for listening.  

  6. 8 hours ago, ronws said:

    You posted twice so we will like it more.

     

    Haha damn, I didn't know I posted it twice sorry. :)

     

    6 hours ago, KillerKu said:

    It's good. It's also an excellent choice for progression into head voice. I was listening to the Slider album awhile back and was thinking of how Bolan was the antithesis of pulling chest. It's light, it's thin, and wispy, but it's not strained or pulled at all. It seems like a sound that can be built from with the right resonance and maybe a bit more closure, but not a huge amount.

    It won't function very well by pressing, pulling, squeezing for more. All good sounds that we appreciate, but you aren't pulling chest anymore. :D

    Man that's exactly what I was thinking, I was trying to come up with new songs/artists to work with to get me into a lighter function and just like you said I was like, "Ah Marc, the master of not pulling chest."  Thanks for listening everyone. :) 

  7. I liked this as well, Jeremy. Excellent work! Your voice could be a little prominent in the mix, something i usually do myself.

    Thanks man, my problem was that I recorded the guitar and the vocals at the same time and had bad mic placement.  I probably should have recorded them separately but it's a lot of fun just powering through the song like that.  Thanks for the listen and critique. : )

×
×
  • Create New...